Perbandingan Komposisi Giblet Beberapa Jenis Itik Pada Pemeliharaan Semi Intensif

La Ode Muntia; Harapin Hafid; Astriana Napirah

doi:10.61316/jrma.v2i3.75

Perbandingan Komposisi Giblet Beberapa Jenis Itik Pada Pemeliharaan Semi Intensif

La Ode Muntia, Harapin Hafid, Astriana Napirah

Sari

The purpose of this study was to determine the carcass composition of several different types of ducks in a semi-intensive maintenance system. There were 16 ducks used with 3 months of age based on a complete randomized design (CRD) with 4 different duck treatments and 4 replications. Based on the results and discussion, it can be concluded that at the same age, Peking duck, alabio duck, manila duck and mojosari duck were significantly different (P <0.01) in cutting weight, carcass percentage, thigh percentage, back percentage, gizzard percentage and fat percentage abdominal. Meanwhile, the different types of ducks did not affect (P> 0.05) chest percentage, wing percentage, neck percentage and heart percentage. In general, live weight, percentage of carcasses and parts of carcasses of manila ducks were superior to mojosari ducks, alabio ducks and Peking ducks. The alabio duck is superior to the Peking duck and the mojosari duck. In terms of non-carcass organs, mojosari ducks had a percentage of gizzard superior to Peking, alabio and manila ducks, while the percentage of liver was significantly different (P <0.05) and the percentage of heart was not significantly different (P> 0.05). The abdominal fat content of alabio duck is very different from that of Peking duck, mojsari duck and manila duck.

Kata Kunci

Alabio duck, Manila duck, Mojosari duck, Percentage of carcass, Peking duck

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Ambaryani. 2019. Korelasi bobot hidup dengan berat organ giblet (ampela, hati, jantung) pada ayam pedaging fase finisher. Sarjana thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.

Aqsa, A.D., Kiramang, K. and Hidayat, M.N. 2016. Profil organ dalam ayam pedaging (broiler) yang diberi tepung daun sirih (piper betle linn) sebagai imbuhan pakan. Jurnal Ilmu dan Industri Perternakan. 3(1) : 148-159.

[BPS] Peternakan. 2018. Buku Statistik Peternakan. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. Departemen Pertanian RI.

Hafid, H. 2011. Pengantar Evaluasi Karkas. Cetakan pertama. Penerbit Unhalu Press, Kendari.

Hafid. H. Nuraini & Inderawati: 2015. Potensi produksi karkas itik afkir lokal yang berasal dari peternakan rakyat di Sulawesi Tenggara. Prosiding seminar nasaional peternakan dan veteriner. Bogor. Halaman 443-447.

Hafid, H., Rahman, Nuraini, Y. Wati, Inderawati, S.H. Ananda and L. Ba'a. 2018. Production of broiler chicken carcass fed on rice bran biomass on different marketed ages. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 209: 1 – 9.

Hafid H, A. Napirah, M. Sarifu. 2019. Effect of electrical stimulation on physical and organoleptic properties of muscovy duck meat. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner. 23(4) : 202-209.

Nuraini, A. Napirah, H. Hafid, F. Nasiu , R. Libriani, Y.Yaddi, Elfia and S.H. Ananda. 2020. Feed Consumption, Average Daily Gain and Feed Conversion of Broiler Chicken with Different Feed. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 465 (2020) 012047.

Hafid, H. 2024. Comparison of Carcass Percentage among four duck breeds under traditional rearing conditions. ndonesian Journal of Agricultural Research 7(1) : 52-59

Rudi, S.N. Rahmatullah dan A. Ismanto. 2021. Pengaruh pemberian infusa daun tambora (ageratum conyzoides l) terhadap kualitas karkas ayam broiler. Jurnal Peternakan Lingkungan Tropis 4 (1) : 43-53.

Saputra, H. T., N. Khaira dan S. Dian. 2015. Pengaruh penggunaan berbagai jenis litter terhadap bobot hidup, karkas, giblet, dan lemak abdominal broiler fase finisher di Closed House. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu. 3(1):38-44.

Simanullang, Sarito., Setiawan, Iwan., Hilmia Nena. 2015. Bobot Potong, Edible dan Non Edible Itik Peking Mojosari Putih (Pmp) Pada Pemberian Pakan Sisa Rumah Makan dan Komersial. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Padjadjaran.

Soeparno. 2015. Ilmu dan Teknologi Daging. Edisi Revisi. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61316/jrma.v2i3.75